Intracorporate conspiracy doctrine

The civil whistleblower provisions are administered by the Department of Labor from MBA 6330 at University of Houston, Downtown

For these reasons, officers or employees of the same firm do not provide the plurality of actors imperative for a § 1 conspiracy. Id. at 769, 104 S.Ct. 2731. An exception to the intra-enterprise conspiracy doctrine applies to individuals within a single entity when they are pursuing economic interests separate from the entity.The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine would apply to Bradshaw and Ethier—as officers of Seller. The intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine does not apply to Prudential and Szejner because Prudential and Szejner are not officers or agents of Seller. Buyer alleges that Szejner—and therefore Prudential because Szejner was acting in his capacity ...Lockheed Martin Corp., 206 F.3d 1031, 1035 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc) ("The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine holds that acts of corporate agents are attributed to the corporation itself, thereby negating the multiplicity of actors necessary for the formation of a conspiracy. Simply put, under the doctrine, a corporation cannot conspire with ...the proper application of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. 19 Case 1:19-cv-00016-SM Document 16 Filed 11/13/19 Page 20 of 23. to civil rights conspiracy claims brought under Section 1985(3). Ziglar, 137 S. Ct. at 1867. It noted: To be sure, this Court has not given its approval to this doctrine in the specific context of § 1985(3).The Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine is a common-law doctrine in American law that states that members of a corporation, such as employees, cannot be held to have conspired among …plicability of specific tort doctrines is examined briefly. Part III then addresses the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, setting out its el-ements and its applicability within the company. In Part …RICO: Whether the district court erred in dismissing claims; whether the court erred in its application of the intracorporate . ... Todd McMahen. conspiracy doctrine. ( Bennett ) _____ 11-1770 Briefs. TITLE VII: Whether district court improperly weighed comparator evidence in finding absence of pretext. Melvin Crawley v. Norfolk Southern ...

The trial court dismissed the conspiracy count, ruling that the "intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine" precluded the viability of a conspiracy claim against a company and its agents. Although the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal, its opinion reconfirmed that the doctrine is not absolute; there is an important exception.Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine "officers, agents and employees of a single corporate entity are legally incapable of conspiring together." Hartline v. Gallo, 546 F.3d 95, 99 n.3 (2d Cir. 2008) (quotation marks omitted). While the Second Circuit has applied this theory to § 1985 claims, see Herrmann v.The “intracorporate conspiracy doctrine” extends to agents and independent contractors of a corporation. Id. An entity cannot conspire with itself. The entity’s agents and employees who were acting within the scope of their duties on its behalf are not conspirators. Id. The principal has the right throughout the duration of the ...Latronico also raised the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine in the motion to dismiss, but acknowledges in reply that it is inapplicable to this case. [35 at 5.] Molina has adequately pled a plausible claim for civil conspiracy. As explained below, David's conduct gave rise to several plausible claims under state tort law.HRCC argues that its civil conspiracy claim is cognizable under the "personal stake exception" to the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. (Doc. 121, p. 19). Under that exception, a corporate employee may be liable for conspiring with his or her corporation or with other corporate agents where "the agent has a personal stake in the activities ...

A conspiracy requires the combination of two or more persons. To state a claim for civil conspiracy, a plaintiff must show:- 1.An...The doctrine of intracorporate conspiracy has posed conceptual problems for the courts, however, because under corporate agency principles a corporation is personified through the acts of its agents and therefore the requisite element of plurality of actors is not present.Sep 30, 2017 · The intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine generally prevents a plaintiff from asserting a claim for civil conspiracy against agents and their corporations for internal agreements to commit wrongful conduct. The Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine and D&O Litigation Incentives. Number of pages: 3 Posted: 21 Mar 2015. J.S. Nelson Harvard Law School Downloads 24. View PDF; Download; Abstract: 6. The Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine and CEO Turnover. Number of pages: 3 Posted: 21 Mar 2015. J.S. Nelson Harvard Law School Downloads 20.

Psyduck perler.

Mar 8, 2000 · A panel of this Court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing McAndrew's state law claim but reversed the ruling dismissing the § 1985 (2) claim holding that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine did not apply to § 1985 claims alleging civil rights violations. See McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 177 F.3d 1310, 1313 (11th Cir. 1999). The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine does not provide protection against conspiracy laws when the entity itself was established for the purpose of engaging in the discriminatory acts to be remedied by § 1985. People by Abrams v. 11 Cornwell Co., 695 F.2d 34, 41 (2d Cir. 1982) ("[I]t would be anomalous in any case to permit an entity which ...Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine (Count X) Alternatively, Defendants argue that if ITSA does not preempt the civil conspiracy claim, the Court should dismiss the claim pursuant to the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. 4 Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, "[t]he acts of an agent are considered in law to be the acts of the ...prove the formation of a conspiracy is not present. In contrast to civil conspiracy cases, courts have recognized an exception to the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine for intracorporate criminal conspiracies arising under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (see McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 206 F.3d 1031, 1036-38 (11th Cir. 2000)).The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine has distorted agency law and inappropriately handicaps the ability of tort and criminal law to regulate the behavior of organizations and their agents. My Intracorporate Conspiracy Trap article argues that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine is not properly based in agency law, and that it …Dec 9, 2019 · The Eleventh Circuit has also held that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine applies to conspiracy to obstruct claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1985(3), which prohibits two or more persons from conspiring to deprive any person equal protection of the laws. See Dickerson, 200 F. 3d at 767 (applying intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to § 1985(3 ...

Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine Schaeffer argues that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine bars Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) claim. The rationale behind the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine is that a corporation is a single entity that can act only by and through its officers and agents, thus precluding the plurality of legal ...Jan 23, 1991 · The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, which states that if "all of the defendants are members of the same… 328 Citing Cases Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetext’s legal research suite. Abstract. The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine immunizes an enterprise and its agents from conspiracy prosecution based on the legal fiction that an enterprise and its agents are a single actor incapable of the meeting of two minds to form a conspiracy. The doctrine, however, misplaces incentives in contravention of agency law, criminal law ...For more extensive discussions of the intra-enterprise conspiracy doctrine, see Handler & Smart, The Present Status of the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine, 3 CARDOZO L. REV. 23 (1981); Handler, Through the Looking Glass -Twenty-First Annual Antitrust Review 57 CALIF. L. REV. 182 (1969); Willis & Pitofsky, Antitrust ...Therefore, even if Warr had presented evidence of an agreement—and, to be clear, he has not—the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine would likely bar Warr's conspiracy claim. D. Warr's Monell Claim Must be Dismissed. Defendants next argue that Warr has failed to establish municipal liability under § 1983. (Dkt. 88-1 at 19-21).The intracorporate-conspiracy doctrine holds that employees of the same corporation are incapable of conspiring with one another as a matter of law. See Girard v. 94th St. & Fifth Ave. Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70-72 (2d Cir. 1976). The Second Circuit has recently extended the doctrine to cover conspiracy claims against government officers within the ...Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, it was a tautology that no conspiracy could be possible. This case is interesting not only because it documents the way that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine protects enterprises from inquiry into conspiracies, but also because of the subsequent history of its allegations. The full extent of ...The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine provides that, as a matter of law, a corporation cannot conspire with its own employees or agents. See Washington v. Duty Free Shoppers, 696 F. Supp. 1323, 1325 (N.D.Cal.1988). [3] The logic for the doctrine comes directly from the definition of a conspiracy. A conspiracy requires a meeting of minds.

issue concerns what is known as the intra-enterprise conspiracy doctrine. This doctrine seeks to ascertain when affiliated corporations should be considered distinct entities and, thus, have the capacity to conspire to restrain trade. in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. Providing no easy answer,

Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine (ICD), a corporation’s employees, acting as agents of the corporation, are deemed incapable of conspiring among themselves or with the corporation. ICD developed in antitrust law (United States v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 20 F.3d 974, 979 (9th Cir. 1994)), and stems from basic agency None holds the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine 6 In other kettling incident damage actions, Judge Sippel granted qualified immunity on the § 1983 conspiracy claim, concluding “[i]n light of this landscape, it cannot be said that the law regarding the application of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine in § 1983 cases is clearly ...Handler & Smart, The Present Status of the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine, 3 ... tinguish prior intra-enterprise conspiracy doctrine cases in Copperweld, it ...The powerful intracorporate conspiracy doctrine immunizes an enterprise and its agents from conspiracy prosecution based on the legal fiction that an enterprise and its agents are a single actor incapable of the meeting of two minds to form a conspiracy. As the statute of limitations expires on most other types of crimes that employees ...The intracorporate-conspiracy doctrine is based on a straightforward concept: a conspiracy involves an agreement between two people, but "if all defendants are members of the same collective entity, there are not two separate 'people' to form a conspiracy." Jackson v. City of Cleveland, 925 F.3d 793, 817 (6th Cir. 2019).Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, "a civil conspiracy cannot exist between a corporation's own officers or employees." Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 683 N.E.2d 985, 991 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). There are two exceptions to this rule: (1) "where corporate employees are shown to have been motivated solely by personal bias ...intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. However, the district court denied the individual defendants’ (the only appellants here) motion to dismiss the 1985(3) claims against them. The court held that (1) qualified immunity does not apply to § 1985(3) claims and, in the alternative, (2) McKee’s complaint demonstrates a course of conduct that wasAccording to Defendants, the DeSandres’ civil conspiracy claim is barred by the intracorporate-conspiracy doctrine. (ECF No. 22, PageID.122.) The intracorporate-conspiracy doctrine is based on a straightforward concept: a conspiracy involves an agreement between two people, but “if all defendants are members of the same collective entity ...Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, certain actors who "operate within and for the benefit of a single economic enterprise" do not meet the "concerted action" requirement of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Podiatrist Ass'n, Inc. v. La Cruz Azul de Puerto Rico, Inc., 332 F.3d 6, 13 (1st Cir. 2003).

Franz liszt transcendental etudes.

Ku texas basketball score.

May 26, 2005 · To establish jurisdiction under this theory, a plaintiff in Delaware must satisfy a five (5) part test by establishing that: (1) a conspiracy to defraud [or other unlawful act] existed; (2) the defendant was a member of that conspiracy; (3) a substantial act or substantial effect in furtherance of the conspiracy occurred in the forum state; (4 ... 12. Commentators severely criticized the intra-enterprise doctrine for being for-malistic and for punishing business behavior that did not raise antitrust concerns. See, e.g., Areeda, Intraenterprise Conspiracy in Decline, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 451, 452-53 (1983); Handler & Smart, The Present Status of the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine,The "intracorporate conspiracy doctrine" has been recognized within the Seventh Circuit, and has been held to bar conspiracy claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 where all the alleged conspirators are employees of the same corporate entity. Travis v.Third, the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine does not bar Brew City's claims, as alleged, for conspiracy to maliciously injure business under Wis. Stat. § 134.01 and for conspiracy to tortiously interfere with contract. Although we apply a different rationale with respect to Brew City's § 134.01 claims, we affirm the court of ...conspiracy claim was brought against the officers in their individual and official capacities, the latter of which the district court treated as claim against the City. a At summary judgment, the City argued that the conspiracy claim against it was barred by the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. Additionally, the officers raisedThe "intracorporate conspiracy doctrine" has been recognized within the Seventh Circuit, and has been held to bar conspiracy claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 where all the alleged conspirators are employees of the same corporate entity. Travis v.conspiracy claim was brought against the officers in their individual and official capacities, the latter of which the district court treated as claim against the City. a At summary judgment, the City argued that the conspiracy claim against it was barred by the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. Additionally, the officers raised University of KansasCowing responds that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine does not apply since it conflicts with the unambiguous language of KRS 344.280 and thus undermines the antidiscriminatory goals of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act. -5- The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine holds that "a corporation cannot conspire with its employees, and its employees ... ….

The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine has distorted agency law and inappropriately handicaps the ability of tort and criminal law to regulate the behavior of organizations and their agents. My Intracorporate Conspiracy Trap article argues that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine is not properly based in agency law, and that it …Gilland, 390 S.C. 312, 325, 701 S.E.2d 39, 46 (Ct. App. 2010) (referring to the principle set forth in McMillan as the "intracorporate conspiracy" doctrine). Moreover, we find any amendment to Hoagland's civil conspiracy claim would be futile because, although he sought to amend his civil conspiracy claim to better plead special damages and ...One wonders why this doctrine has any place at all in § 1983 litigation, especially when such litigation involves § 1983 conspiracy claims against police officers accused of violating a plaintiff’s constitutional rights. After all, § 1983 conspiracy doctrine, which focuses on wrongful state of mind, is a species of § 1983 joint and ...Further, Plaintiff submits that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine does not apply because he alleges that Williams steps outside of his role as corporate officer, an exception to the doctrine. Plaintiff argues that under Florida law, if an act amounts to an intentional act, the recovery of punitive damages is permitted.Feb 15, 2018 · — The Rule 12.02(6) motion to dismiss the Count V civil conspiracy claim has been granted based upon the intra-corporate doctrine. 3. The November 9, 2017 Defendant Stacy Stephens’ Motion For More Definite Statement Pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.05 is denied. In addition, case law and analysis concerning conspiracy theory specific personal The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine applies unless individual employees are "pursuing personal interests wholly separate and apart from the entity." Ali v. Connick, 136 F.Supp.3d 270, 282 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). To meet the exception, Mr. Kinnel must do more than simply allege that the Defendants were ...Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, it was a tautology that no conspiracy could be possible. This case is interesting not only because it documents the way that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine protects enterprises from inquiry into conspiracies, but also because of the subsequent history of its allegations. ...The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine offers a solution to the conflict between conspiracy law and the common law rule that corporations are single, unitary actors. Under the doctrine, a plaintiff cannot establish the multiplicity of actors necessary for a conspiracy by pointing to two or more employees of a single cor-poration; the theory ...The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine "applies only when the agents of a corporation or government entity act within the scope of their employment in joint pursuit of the entity's lawful business." Gray v. City of Chicago, No. 18 C 2624, 2022 WL 910601, at *14 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 29, 2022) (citation omitted); Harris v. ...Oct 13, 2020 · The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine was firmly established in Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons,' 3 . a case involving the present de-fendant. As in the instant case, the plaintiff alleged a section 1 conspiracy among the defendant's wholly-owned subsidiaries for their refusal to continue dealing Intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, Third, Defendants argue that Plaintiff's Complaint is barred by the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, it is not legally possible for there to be a conspiracy within a corporation. Anvar v. Greenville Hospital System, No. 2007-UP-004, 2007 WL 8324255 at *4 (S.C. Ct. App. 2007) (unpublished)., After the Court issued the August 7th Decision and Order, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision, Victory v.Pataki, 609 Fed.Appx. 680 (2d Cir.2015). In Victory, the Second Circuit did not expressly address whether the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine should apply to claims by inmates against DOCCS employees, but …, Jun 30, 2021 · See Stathos, 728 F.2d at 20-21 (doubting the applicability of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to a case with equal protection violations at issue, but holding that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine did not apply under the facts of that case because the defendants' activities went beyond a "single act" and instead involved a …, Moreover, Standard Oil Co. involved charges of criminal conspiracy. Because the case presently before us involves allegations of civil conspiracy, we leave for another day the decision of whether to apply the intracorporate conspiracy immunity doctrine in the criminal context." Id . at 703-04., The intracorporate-conspiracy doctrine bars it; moreover, Plaintiff insufficiently alleges an agreement for § 1983 conspiracy and motivation by racial or class-based animus for § 1985 conspiracy. I will deny leave to amend, given the unlikelihood of cure and the likelihood of undue delay and distraction., Under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine "officers, agents and employees of a single corporate entity are legally incapable of conspiring together." Hartline v. Gallo, 546 F.3d 95, 99 n.3 (2d Cir. 2008) (quotation marks omitted). While the Second Circuit has applied this theory to § 1985 claims, see Herrmann v., The Intra-Corporate Conspiracy Doctrine In Florida. A conspiracy requires the combination of two or more persons. To state a claim for civil conspiracy, a plaintiff must show: The doing of some ..., HRCC argues that its civil conspiracy claim is cognizable under the "personal stake exception" to the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. (Doc. 121, p. 19). Under that exception, a corporate employee may be liable for conspiring with his or her corporation or with other corporate agents where "the agent has a personal stake in the activities ..., This case raises the discrete question of the applicability of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1985(2) and alleging a conspiracy among corporate officers and the corporation itself to deter by force, intimidation, or threat, an individual from testifying in a court of the United States., The Court ruled that the independent personal stake exception to the intracorporate immunity doctrine - if recognized in Virginia for a statutory business conspiracy claim - was not applicable given the facts involved in this case. Id. at *40-46., According to the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, a corporation cannot conspire with itself through its agents when the acts of the agents are within the scope of their employment. Runs After v. United States, 766 F.2d 347, 354 (8th Cir. 1985). The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine is equally applicable to governmental entities such as ..., Lockheed Martin Corp., 206 F.3d 1031, 1035 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc) ("The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine holds that acts of corporate agents are attributed to the corporation itself, thereby negating the multiplicity of actors necessary for the formation of a conspiracy. Simply put, under the doctrine, a corporation cannot conspire with ..., The powerful intracorporate conspiracy doctrine immunizes an enterprise and its agents from conspiracy prosecution based on the legal fiction that an enterprise and its agents are a single actor incapable of the meeting of two minds to form a conspiracy. As the statute of limitations expires on most other types of crimes that employees ..., The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine does not provide protection against conspiracy laws when the entity itself was established for the purpose of engaging in the discriminatory acts to be remedied by § 1985. People by Abrams v. 11 Cornwell Co., 695 F.2d 34, 41 ..., This case raises the discrete question of the applicability of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) and alleging a conspiracy among corporate officers and the corporation itself to deter by force, intimidation, or threat, an individual from testifying in a court of the United States., The Court sees no basis by which Plaintiff could plead the conspiracy theory in a way that would state a plausible claim. 22 Case 1:20-cv-03792-MEH Document 65 Filed 01/07/22 USDC Colorado Page 23 of 23 Moreover, Plaintiff’s Motion for Amendment of Complaint [filed October 13, 2021; ECF 57] is denied. , 20 korr 2017 ... ... doctrines which have been successfully utilized in business litigation: Intracorporate Conspiracy Immunity Doctrine (a/k/a Inra-enterprise ..., City of Albany, 247 F.3d 1172, 1189 (11th Cir. 2001) (upholding the dismissal of plaintiff's § 1985(3) claim under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine). Having dismissed defendants' §§ 1981, 1982 and 1985 claims, there is no basis for their claims under §§ 1986 and 1988. "The text of § 1986 requires the existence of a § 1985 conspiracy.", Plaintiffs argue, and this Court agrees that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine should not be extended to §§ 1985(3) and 1986 because its rationale does not apply in the civil rights context. In the area of civil rights, a real danger exists from the collaboration among agents of a single business to discriminate. There is no reason to ..., employment as mayor to save this claim from the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. See Johnson, 40 F.3d at 839-40, 841 (6th Cir. 1994) (intracorporate conspiracy doctrine holds that employees who work for the same agency cannot conspire with themselves; creating an exception where employees act outside the course of their employment). III., ShoreGood Water Company, Inc. et al v. US Bottling Company et al, No. 1:2008cv02470 - Document 35 (D. Md. 2009) case opinion from the District of Maryland U.S. Federal District Court, Fundamentally, it takes two or more persons to complete a conspiracy. For purposes of this requirement, corporations are people. However, under the ..., The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine holds that acts of corporate agents are attributed to the corporation itself, thereby negating the multiplicity of actors necessary for the formation of a conspiracy. Simply put, under the doctrine, a corporation cannot conspire with its employees, and its employees, when acting in the scope of their ..., To establish jurisdiction under this theory, a plaintiff in Delaware must satisfy a five (5) part test by establishing that: (1) a conspiracy to defraud [or other unlawful act] existed; (2) the defendant was a member of that conspiracy; (3) a substantial act or substantial effect in furtherance of the conspiracy occurred in the forum state; (4 ..., intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. However, the district court denied the individual defendants’ (the only appellants here) motion to dismiss the 1985(3) claims against them. The court held that (1) qualified immunity does not apply to § 1985(3) claims and, in the alternative, (2) McKee’s complaint demonstrates a course of conduct that was, E. Conspiracy Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Lastly, Defendants argue that Plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts to form the basis of a Section 1985 conspiracy claim and alternatively argues that this claim is barred by the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. Plaintiff's complaint includes a claim of "conspiracy to deprive civil rights.", The plaintiff has failed to create a genuine issue as to whether the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine applies here. Therefore, the motion is being granted as to the Fourth and Sixth Counts. IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Motion of Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs For Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 111) is hereby ..., The intracorporate immunity doctrine, also called the intracorporate conspiracy rule, is a defense to a tort claim for civil conspiracy (where it exists) and for vicarious liability based on …, intracorporate conspiracy doctrine. However, the district court denied the individual defendants’ (the only appellants here) motion to dismiss the 1985(3) claims against them. The court held that (1) qualified immunity does not apply to § 1985(3) claims and, in the alternative, (2) McKee’s complaint demonstrates a course of conduct that was, Finally, the civil rights conspiracy claim (Count IV) must be dismissed as Mr. Hicks does not plead facts demonstrating an agreement between any defendants to deprive him of his rights, and even if he 3 had, the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine would bar liability as no facts demonstrate that any alleged conspiring officers acted due to an ..., Hartley, 678 F.2d 961, 968 (11th Cir. 1982) (declining to apply the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to the criminal context and coining the delightful term “octopus intracorporate doctrine” to describe its expansion), abrogated by United States v. Goldin Indus., 219 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc)., The intracorporate conspiracy doctrine, as it is called, originated in the antitrust context, see Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752, 769 (1984), and its application to civil rights conspiracies is an open question in this circuit. 4., The justices will soon hear major cases on voting rights, affirmative action and partisan gerrymandering. Here's a preview. The Supreme Court began its new term on Monday. "There are few signs ...